NEW YORK--()--Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BBB' rating to Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.'s (KMP) $1 billion of 10-year and 30-year notes. The Rating Outlook is Stable. Note proceeds will be used to repay commercial paper and for general corporate purposes, potentially including for acquisitions.
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI; IDR 'BB+', Outlook Stable by Fitch) is the owner of the 2% general partner and approximately 10% limited partner interests in KMP. KMI acquired El Paso Corporation (EP) in a $38 billion transaction that closed on May 24, 2012.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
KMP remains an active acquirer. On Aug. 1, 2012, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. (TGP) and 50% El Paso Natural Gas Co. (EPNG) were dropped down to KMP from KMI in a transaction valued at $6.22 billion, including about $1.8 billion in assumed debt at TGP and $560 million in proportional debt at EPNG. The remaining 50% interests in EPNG and EL Paso Midstream Investment Co. that KMP doesn't already own are expected to be dropped down to KMP in the coming months. On Jan. 29, 2013, KMP announced an agreement to purchase Copano Energy, L.L.C. (CPNO) for a total purchase price of approximately $5 billion, including assumed debt. The transaction will be a 100% unit for unit transaction and is expected to close in the third quarter of 2013. CPNO is a midstream natural gas company with operations primarily located in Texas, Oklahoma, and Wyoming. KMI has agreed to forego a portion of its incentive distributions related to the transactions.
KMP's rating and Stable Outlook reflect the significant and growing scale and scope of operations; geographic and functional diversity of assets; successful track record in acquiring, expanding, financing and operating energy operations; predictable earnings and cash flow generated from natural gas and refined products pipelines; and expectations for stable credit metrics in 2013 with adjusted Debt to EBITDA to approximate 4.0 times (x) or below for the year. Moreover, recent and pending acquisitions are funded in a credit-neutral manor. TGP and EPNG generate stable cash flows and, along with CPNO midstream operations, will be good fits with KMP's MLP structure.
Other considerations and credit concerns include KMP's relationship with KMI, exposure to interest rates on approximately $6.2 billion of variable rate debt, modestly negative effects in weak economies on asset utilization, aggressive expansion spending, and exposure to changes in NGL and oil prices and volumes for its CO2 and midstream business segments.
Liquidity Is Adequate: KMP has a $2.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility that matures in July 2016. KMP issues 'F2' rated commercial paper under a $2.2 billion CP program backstopped by its revolver. At Dec. 31, 2012, KMP had $518 million of cash and $1.359 billion of borrowing capacity. CP borrowings were $1.374 billion at Feb. 19, 2013. Net proceeds of approximately $335 million from common unit financing launched today will be used to reduce debt. The revolver has a maximum debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.0 to 1.0; no greater than 5.5 to 1.0 during an acquisition period. KMP is also party to a reserve-based hedging facility for purposes of hedging crude oil that does not require the posting of margin.
Positive: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action include:
--A lessening of consolidated business risk as the company acquires and expands pipeline and fixed-fee businesses; and
--A material improvement in credit metrics with sustained leverage at 3.5x or below.
Negative: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a negative rating action include:
--Increasing leverage to support organic growth and acquisitions;
--Weakening operating performance; and
--Sustained debt/EBITDA above approximately 4.25x.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings above were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been compensated for the provision of the ratings.
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Corporate Rating Methodology' Aug. 8, 2012;
--'The Top Ten Differences Between MLP and Corporate Issuers' Feb. 19, 2013;
--'2013 Outlook: Natural Gas Pipelines and MLPs' Nov. 29, 2012;
--'2013 Outlook: Midstream Services and MLPs' Nov. 29, 2012;
--'2013 Outlook: Crude Oil and Refined Products Pipelines' Nov. 29, 2012;
--Eagle Ford Shale Report - Economics Driving Growth' Oct. 15, 2012;
--'Marcellus Shale Report: Midstream and Pipeline Sector Challenges and Opportunities' June 10, 2012;
--'Top Ten Questions Asked by Pipeline, Midstream, and MLP Investors' May 1, 2012; and
--'Master Limited Partnerships 101' Nov. 1, 2011.
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Eagle Ford Shale Report (Midstream and Pipeline Sector ￢ﾀﾔ Economics Driving Growth)
Marcellus Shale Report: Midstream and Pipeline Sector -- Challenges/Opportunities
Top Ten Questions Asked by Pipeline, Midstream and MLP Investors
Master Limited Partnerships 101
Corporate Rating Methodology
The Top Ten Differences Between MLP and Corporate Issuers
2013 Outlook: Natural Gas Pipelines & MLPs
2013 Outlook: Midstream Services and MLPs
2013 Outlook: Crude Oil and Refined Products Pipelines